Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams Review: Is It Worth Reading?

Careless People by Sarah Wynn-Williams is a memoir about the years she spent working at Facebook. Got to know about it only because Facebook wanted to stop the book from being sold... which, if you think, is the best possible advertisement for a book.

I added it to my list when it launched, bought a copy when I saw, but didn’t find time to pick it up. Finally got to reading it a year later... in Aug 2026.

For a good long stretch, Careless People reads like a fun novel. It’s a book worth reading. Sarah is fun to read, the humour is dark, and the stories are creepy. But gradually, it started feeling like a largely one-sided narrative.

My Rating:

❤️❤️❤️❤️🤍

A largely one-sided narrative.

Check Careless People on Goodreads

Buy Careless People on Amazon

What the Book is About

So, Sarah was a New Zealand diplomat who basically talked her way into Facebook. Because she thought it was a good platform for people to reach people without restrictions. She convinced them they needed someone who understood governments, and was hired.

Careless People is the account of the years that followed – the seven-odd years she spent inside Facebook's global policy team. In the rooms where the company decided how it would deal with presidents, prime ministers and the governments of the world.

Sarah is the narrator and the protagonist both, and the setting is less Silicon Valley. The book is more a glimpse of Facebook’s worldly insider experiences.

Is Careless People a True Story?

Yes, as per Sarah. It's a memoir, after all; not fiction. Sarah spent roughly seven years at Facebook from 2011, ending up as director of global public policy, and the book is her firsthand account of that stretch. She's repeated the substance of it in sworn testimony before a Senate subcommittee, and filed whistleblower disclosures with the SEC and the Justice Department.

And it’s all just one participant's account... not a neutral, fact-checked or documented history. Meta disputes chunks of it, and a lot of the sharpest material is inherently her word against theirs. It’s about what was said in rooms only a handful of people were in.

What Works in Favour of the Book?

The writing, first. Sarah writes really well, and you keep forgetting you're reading a memoir about a tech company. Like there was this incident in which someone suggested that someone from Facebook should visit Myanmar because the country "turned off" Facebook. And Sarah was like...

"Oh, you mean I should go to Myanmar?" I say eventually. "Should I stop off in North Korea on the way home?"

That made me chuckle. The humour is dark like that throughout, and it does a lot of work. It keeps you moving through material that would otherwise be grim, and it tells you exactly how absurd the room felt from the inside.

But under all the fun and sarcasm, it's really a book about recklessness. It shows what happens when an enormous amount of money and power sits with a very small group of people who aren't especially careful with it.

Executives who don't seem to know where countries are. And a world tour where the team isn't really acting professionally... and thus, losing diplomatic support.

For example, the Colombia chapter... She'd worked hard to get Mark in front of President Santos, who was in the middle of peace negotiations at the time. And Mark turned up late and bored and blew the whole thing. You feel that one, and get annoyed with Mark’s behaviour.

The Myanmar sections are the other standout. Dealing with a military junta, watching Facebook become the entire internet for a country, flagging that things were going badly wrong and getting nowhere. Fascinating and horrifying both.

What Falls Short?

Somewhere around the halfway mark, after the Davos chapter, I started getting bored. The book was getting overly repetitive. Not the same experiences every time, of course, but Sarah being overly critical. The chapters were mostly restating one thought over and over.

So, I was like... OK, I got it. I believe you, Sarah. They're careless people; they're not ethical; they aren't considerate about others. But it all felt like a one-sided story, and somewhere around the halfway mark... this darkly funny memoir started to lose its charm. And I gave up.

However, I do agree with Sarah on one count: about Facebook's hunger for personal data. It had no qualms about hogging information from users.

As a marketer, I'd always found Meta ads a bit repelling. As Facebook knew a lot about its users, the ad targeting options were quite precise. It always felt like sneaking into someone's private moments and then selling your products to them.

And the book makes clear that ethics simply weren't part of the conversation at Facebook. It was a strange kind of satisfaction.

What Does Mark Zuckerberg Think of Careless People?

He hasn't said much about it publicly himself. Meta has done the talking – it called the book a mix of out-of-date and previously reported claims plus false accusations about its executives, and said Sarah was using the legal process to sell books.

More telling than any statement is that Meta won an emergency arbitration ruling barring her from promoting the book or repeating her claims, with penalties reported at up to $50,000 per violation.

That was when the book started making rounds around the Internet, and came under my radar in the first place. Whatever you make of the book itself, the fight around it has been a better argument for reading it than any blurb could manage.

What Are the Allegations in Careless People?

Broadly, they fall into four piles.

• China. That Facebook built censorship tooling to court Beijing, censored a Chinese dissident at officials' request, and misled Congress about its China operations – all in pursuit of a market worth billions. This is the material that became the centre of her Senate testimony.
• Myanmar. That the company let Facebook become the entire internet for a country under a military junta, and that internal warnings about where it was heading went nowhere. Meta itself admitted back in 2018 that it was "too slow to act" there.
• Harassment and executive conduct. Allegations against Joel Kaplan, her direct supervisor and now Meta's president of global affairs, along with some deeply unflattering accounts of Sheryl Sandberg.
• General recklessness. Executives out of their depth on the world stage, diplomatic relationships burned, and data and ad targeting decisions made with ethics simply not in the room. This is the pile the title is really about, and the one that runs through every chapter.

Who Should Read It?

Recommended for anyone working in tech or marketing, anyone who wants to know what it looked like from the inside, and anyone who enjoys a good behind-the-scenes memoir about an evil corporate overlord.

Even if you don't usually pick up business or tech books, don't let the subject put you off. Because the book is pretty much like a novel... with a non-fictional plot.

Final Thoughts

I'm glad I picked the book up. Whatever I read, I enjoyed thoroughly. The Myanmar and Colombia chapters were worth my time on their own. It's a book about power, ambition and the ordinary carelessness that comes with both.

It changes something in you. You go back to your Facebook feed afterwards and look at it a little differently. Still scrolling, of course... but differently. If you've wondered what the people running the feed are actually like, the title pretty much gives you the answer.

Liked this Careless People review?

Join Book Blabbers WhatsApp group to bond over books, memes and quotes.

Subscribe to Book Blabber's Bulletin to get book summaries, reading tips and occasional hugs in your inbox.